|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEFORE |
|
A 22 year-old woman who has not given birth, she has congenitally small breasts with excellent position and shape. She wanted to be larger. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 WEEKS AFTER |
|
Above the muscle implants increased her to the size she wanted, and achieved the cleavage she was looking for. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Side by Side |
|
500cc subglandular implants
From cup size B to a size D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEFORE |
|
This 40 year-old woman had a child but never nursed. She has lost upper pole volume. She wanted to regain her previous shape without large scars on her breasts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 WEEKS AFTER |
|
We were able to augment her breasts and obtain a nice lift without the traditional mastopexy (breast-lift) operation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Side by Side |
|
360cc subglandular implants
From cup size B to a size D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEFORE |
|
This 32 year old woman nursed all four of her children, and developed typical loss of volume of the upper portion of her breasts, with mild drooping. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 WEEKS AFTER |
|
Her breast volume was significantly increased, filling the upper portion again. As you can see, almost all of her drooping was corrected without a surgical lift. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Side by Side |
|
460cc subglandular implants
From cup size B to a size C+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEFORE |
|
This 25 year old woman had lost breast volume after nursing 2 children. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 WEEKS AFTER |
|
Her previous volume and shape were restored using high-profile saline implants |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Side by Side |
|
410cc subglandular implants
From cup size B- to a size C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEFORE |
|
A 31 year-old mother of 2 who has never nursed. No drooping, but congenitally small breasts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 WEEKS AFTER |
|
Above-the-muscle impants added volume, but maintained a natural look and feel. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Side by Side |
|
460cc subglandular implants
From cup size B- to a size D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEFORE |
|
This 38 year-old woman disliked her breast shape. She has never had children or nursed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 WEEKS AFTER |
|
Upper pole volume was replaced with a nice lift of the nipple line. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Side by Side |
|
330cc subglandular implants
From cup size B to a size D-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEFORE |
|
After nursing 3 children, this 35 year-old aerobics instructor lost volume, but did not have much drooping. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 WEEKS AFTER |
|
She had a natural appearing restoration of volume and shape. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Side by Side |
|
500cc subglandular implants
From cup size B- to a size D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEFORE |
|
This 31 yr old woman was unhappy with the sagging and volume loss after having nursed 3 children. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 WEEKS AFTER |
|
Nice volume restoration with elevation of the nipple level. No mastopexy (breast lift) was performed. The scar under the nipple is almost invisible. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
.jpg "Side by Side")
|
|
|
|
Side by Side |
|
420cc subglandular implants
From cup size B- to a size D-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEFORE |
|
A 33 year-old woman lost volume and position, developing tubular breasts after nursing both her children. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 WEEKS AFTER |
|
Subglandular (above the muscle) implants not only added upper pole volume, but rounded out the tubular shape of her breasts. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Side by Side |
|
420cc subglandular implants
From cup size B to a size D
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEFORE |
|
This 23 yr.old had congenital hypoplasia (underdevelopment) of her breasts. She wanted a fuller look, especially in the upper pole. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 WEEKS AFTER |
|
Saline subglandular (above the muscle) implants were placed, resulting in breasts that are not only larger, but fuller on top, creating a much more pleasing profile in and out of clothes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Side by side |
|
350cc subglandular implants
From cup size B to a size D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEFORE |
|
A 45 yr old woman who lost substantial volume and breast position following childbirth. She was very unhappy with the way she looked. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 WEEKS AFTER |
|
Subglandular implants restored her previous breast position and increased her breast size and shape. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Side by Side |
|
500 cc subglandular implants
From cup size B- to a size D |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEFORE |
|
A 51 yr old teacher who never had children or nursed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 WEEKS AFTER |
|
Due to her small pre-op breast size, we placed the implants under the muscle for a more natural look. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Side by Side |
|
325cc submuscular implants
From cup size A- to a size C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEFORE |
|
A 33 year-old housewife who has nursed 2 children
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 WEEKS AFTER |
|
Because of her small breast size, we elected to place the implants under the muscle to minimize visibility. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Side by Side |
|
380cc submuscular implants
From cup size A to a size C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BEFORE |
|
This young woman has mammary hypoplasia (congenital small breasts) and wanted an enlargement. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10 DAYS AFTER |
|
Under the muscle implants tend to hide rippling and gave small-breasted women a natural post-op look. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Side by Side |
|
330cc submuscular implants
From cup size A to a size C
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
